Pathway to publishing [electronic resource] : a guide to quantitative writing in the health sciences / Stephen Luby, Dorothy L. Southern.
Material type: TextPublication details: Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2022.Description: 1 online resourceISBN:- 978-3-030-98175-4
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-Resources | Main Library E-Resources | 808.06661 L929 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | E004801 |
Browsing Main Library shelves, Shelving location: E-Resources Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available No cover image available | ||||||||
808.0666 M345 Technical communication | 808.0666 R165 Technical communication : principles and practice / | 808.0666 T254 The essentials of technical communication / | 808.06661 L929 Pathway to publishing a guide to quantitative writing in the health sciences / | 808.1 L925 Writing and publishing scientific papers : a primer for the non-English speaker / | 808.23 R969 Screenplay : writing the picture / | 808.402 B132 Bad ideas about writing / |
Part I. Introduction: The Pathway to Publishing Part II. Most common errors 1. General research and writing practices 2. Content of quantitative papers 3. Mechanics of writing 4. Grammatical structures and stylistic strategies 5. Achieving clarity and conciseness 6. Recording scientific data 7. Approaching publication 8. Slide and poster presentations.
Writing manuscripts is central to the advance of scientific knowledge. For an early career aspiring scientist, writing first author manuscripts is an opportunity to develop critical skills and to credential their expertise. Writing manuscripts, however, is difficult, doubly so for scientists who use English as a second language. Many science students intentionally avoid a writing-intensive curriculum. Careful, thorough reviews of draft manuscripts are difficult to secure, and experienced scientific supervisors face more demands on their time than they have time available. Weak draft manuscripts discourage supervising scientists investing the time to coach revisions. It is easier for experienced scientists to ignore the request, or to simply rewrite the article. Early career scientists are motivated to address these barriers but specific advice is difficult to find, and much of this advice is behind a pay wall. This essential, open access text presents writing lessons organized as common errors, providing students and early-career researchers with an efficient way to learn, and mentors with a quick-reference guide to reviewing. Error descriptions include specific examples drawn from real-world experiences of other early-career writers, and suggestions for how to successfully address and avoid these in the future. Versions of this book have been used by Stanford University, UC Davis, Johns Hopkins, and numerous international institutions and organizations for over a decade.
There are no comments on this title.