De Alca, Julie Fe S. <br/><br/>
Development and validation of Grade II instructional module for Technology and Livelihood Education-Agrifisheries Arts (Crop Production  [manuscript] / 
Julie Fe S. De Alca. 
 - Balanga City :  BPSU,  2017. 
 - 192 leaves ;  28 cm. 
<br/><br/> Include bibliographical reference. 
<br/><br/> This study entitled "DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF GRADE 11   INSTRUCTIONAL MODULE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND LIVELIHOOD   EDUCATION - AGRIFISHERIES ARTS (CROP PRODUCTION) NC II" primarily   aimed at developing and validating a module for Grade 11 AFA Crop Production leading   to NC II for Bataan National High School-Senior High School students. Selected public   secondary school teachers in TLE Agriculture and Fisheries Arts, as well as supervisors of   TLE from the DepEd Bataan Division Office and experts from the Department of   Agriculture's Agricultural Training Institute (DA-ATI) served as expert content evaluators.   Topics on the module were presented for clarification on how the module was designed.   The lessons were presented in a manner which could easily be understood by the students.   The module catered to the scope of the topics and lesson within the subject and program   offered through the K to 12 Curriculum. The module was patterned after the DepEd   requirements of the subject using the mandated curriculum guide (CG).    Specifically, the study identified the profile of the teacher-respondents in terms of   age, sex, civil status, years of experience, and highest educational attainment. The teacher   respondents, supervisors, and experts assessed the module based on criteria such as   objectives, content validity, manner of presentation, usefulness, and evaluation. The   significant differences in the developed module are described as perceived by the   respondents. The implications of this study to Technology and Livelihood Education   pedagogy, in Agriculture and Fisheries Arts (AFA) component in particular were also   presented.  The data was treated statistically using frequency count, percentage, for the   profile of the respondents, weighted mean for the evaluation of the modules, and independent t-test for the significant differences. The study was limited to the selected   teachers and experts in selected Senior High Schools in the Province of Bataan during   School Year 2016-2017.    Findings revealed that the perception of respondents in terms of objectives, content   validity, manner of presentation, usefulness, and manner of evaluation showed that the   three groups of respondents "Strongly Agree". Overall, the teachers, supervisors and   experts, strongly agree in all the indicators of the module for instruction. Overall, the   respondents were satisfied with the module with the supervisors and experts providing   equal composite means while the faculty members a little bit lower. This indicates that the   module was acceptable among the three groups of respondents.    The differences in perception among the three respondents in terms of the three   domains were also tested in the study. Findings revealed that the respondents had common   perceptions on the module with respect to the attainment of objectives, hence, there is no   difference in the perceptions of respondents on the instructional module with respect to   objectives.  The perceptions of the respondents with respect to content validity were   statistically the same and therefore, no differences exist in the perception of the teachers,   supervisors and experts on the developed module with respect to content validity. With   respect to manner of presentation, the perceptions between the respondents had no   significant differences.  Statistically, there was no difference between the perceptions of   the respondents in terms of the usefulness of the module.  In terms of evaluation, it was   found out that there is no significant differences in the perceptions of the respondents. In   summary, the independent t-test that was conducted to compare the perception of the   teachers, supervisors and experts on the module and all domains consistently showed a no significant difference results, which meant that all throughout the various domains for   evaluating the proposed module, the perception of the respondents converges on a common   area.  Therefore, the lone hypothesis that there is no significant difference in the perceptions   of the expert-respondents in terms of Objectives, Content Validity, Manner of Presentation,   Usefulness and Evaluation was upheld.      It is recommended that the module be subjected to utilization among actual students   whom the module is intended to measure its effectiveness and validity. It was also   recommended that the evaluation activities in the module be subjected for test-retest   analysis and item analysis to further identify the items that could possibly be encountered   as difficult by users of the module. Opportunities for further studies related to the present   study could involve the development of module on other course in Agri-Fisheries Arts,   most especially the continuation of Agricultural Crop Production NC II which is   Agricultural Crop Production NC III.